Counterfactuals and Humean causation

J.P. Moreland writes: “Causal necessitation grounds the derivation of counterfactuals” [J. P. Moreland, The Argument from Consciousness in the Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, p.293]

It occurred to me that counterfactuals cannot be straightforwardly true or false according to a Humean view of causation as constant conjunction. If one believes that causal connections are inferred, and only constant conjunction is empirically observed (and also that there is nothing necessary about causal connections), then one cannot believe in some counterfactual’s being straightforwardly true or false. Consider that a counterfactual such as ‘if I had not stopped the bowling ball from rolling into the pins, then the pins would have been knocked over by the bowling ball’ (of course, this is all things being equal, thus we are properly ignoring the possibility of somebody else stopping the bowling ball, etc.). The statement cannot be considered ‘true’ strictly speaking, since we are only projecting an inductive speculation about our uniform experiences, but there is absolutely no necessary connection between what we perceive as cause and what we perceive as effect.

Perhaps the Humean would want to say that they can speak ‘the counterfactual language game’ by projecting inductive speculation, but they cannot ever take counterfactuals to be straightforwardly true in the sense that, given some set of conditions which causally give rise to some event, if those conditions obtain, then the event necessarily follows.

Advertisements

About tylerjourneaux

I am an aspiring Catholic theologian and philosopher, and I have a keen interest in apologetics. I am creating this blog both in order to practice and improve my writing and memory retention as I publish my thoughts, and in order to give evidence of my ability to understand and communicate thoughts on topics pertinent to Theology, Philosophy, philosophical theology, Catholic (Christian) Apologetics, philosophy of religion and textual criticism.
This entry was posted in Causation, Miscellaneous, Philosophy and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s